Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Being Social


Many brands and companies have attempted to enter the Internet’s multiple social spaces, but few have enjoyed anything approaching resounding success—at least, not if measured against past campaigns in traditional, mass media. The social factor that trips up people is that they persist in thinking of online social venues as “media”—something they can manage and control, in which they can continue to dictate the outcome of their efforts.

But social venues were created to enable social interactions, not brand transactions. Until companies understand this and adapt their own interactions to fit the venue, they will continue to find only haphazard success, and a reluctant welcome in social networks and other social “media.”

Companies tend to launch into social conversations with their old sales-oriented lingo: “Hi there, I’m Joe Smith of ABC Products, and I have a product you’ll love.” That’s an intro that will garner digital rotten tomatoes and an invitation to show yourself to the door. Instead, marketers must learn to enter the conversation as participants, speaking only when they have something valuable to say, and conversing rather than selling. This is a change that company personnel often find difficult. Many companies are now developing staffers who are personally well versed in social media into spokespeople who can guide the company into social venues by “talking the social talk.”

Another impediment to brand success in social venues is that people who flock to social networks tend to deeply distrust brand-managed pages. The most successful brand fan pages are those created by individual users, not brand parent companies. Coca-Cola now sponsors the most popular fan-created Coke page in Facebook; Pringle’s consolidated their three most popular fan-created pages under one umbrella page to merge the voices of 2.8 million fans; Nutella, the hazelnut-flavored spread, has a huge user-generated fan page, with 3.1 million fans.

Even Budweiser’s Bud Light fan page, “Drinkability,” garnered only 1,743 after 6 months online despite promotional efforts including cross-channel ad promotion and NCAA March Madness tie-ins. Smaller companies may find Facebook even less effective because their brands may not generate user fan pages, and attracting users to a company-managed fan page may be difficult.

B2B companies are finding it more effective to: join conversations where their customers and prospects already “live”; monitor those conversations to learn more about their brand’s strongest advocates; and listen to conversations as part of the larger pattern of online “buzz.” Companies that participate rather than manage are growing in authority and brand acceptance in the social media space. Becoming strong listeners rather than trying to dominate the conversation is the new goal for companies exploring social networking as a business tactic.

Social networking can be a portal into many areas of corporate interest, including recruiting, improved customer feedback, one-to-one CRM, and lead development. But social is not the right place for selling… unless the fans are doing the selling for you.

It is time for companies to stop thinking of social networks as channels or tactics, and simply become “fans” themselves. Be a member of the community, rather than trying to be its dictator. Develop the “common touch.”

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Slow Down When Building Your Brand


The process of acquiring the brand positioning statement is intensive and purifying. You gather all the details about your business, its products, people, customers, industry and challenges, sift them until the chaff falls away, then pick out the best, most substantial kernels and use them to define the brand.

The process of definition is a step that too many companies skip. All too often, eager to “get to launch,” companies skip straight to the communications without properly defining and testing the brand position.  This results in brand statements that are inaccurate, and frequently unsupportable. Defining the brand is important because:
·         
      First, it helps desired audiences understand the brand, and helps to establish the same perceptions across all audiences.
·         - It ensures delivery of consistent brand messages across markets and geographical areas.
·         -It serves as the basis for orienting new hires, new customers and new business partners.
·         -It moves the brand from abstract to “real.”

As you review possible positioning statements, consider what it that your company is trying to build.  Break down the brand into its key elements—those factors that contribute to the brand essence.  These include:
1.   Product Essence – What does your brand promise—and deliver—to the customer?
2.   Function – What does your brand do or provide?
3.   Values – What values or qualities do customers associate with your brand?
4.   Personality – What characteristics or “personality traits” are associated with your brand?
5.   Perception – Finally, how does your customer or “brand advocate” perceive your brand essence?
The brand positioning must align with these factors to ensure the positioning will “fit” the brand in the minds and emotions of brand advocates and customers.